The paper had 13 static general knowledge questions. I would predict that a candidate needs to score a minimum of marks in the section. The rest were current affairs questions that should have been easy for all those who have been reading a newspaper daily for the past year or so. Based on the famous Indian television quiz show, Kaun Banega Crorepati, the third passage stood out as the easiest of the lot.
|Date Added:||19 March 2007|
|File Size:||61.84 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
IIFT Question Paper PDF Download | Entranceindia
Out of the four grammar paprr, in one, none of the options posed a correct answer to the question. The Quant section was slightly more difficult than last year. Sectional cut-offs in the paper, overall difficulty level low was last modified: All four passages had four questions each. This made them slightly more difficult than the rest because they required a careful scrutinisation.
It was a third person narrative, presenting a scene between Babur and Humayun. The paper had 13 static general knowledge questions. Amongst the remaining three, two had lengthy sentences in the options. Since the overall difficulty level of the paper was low, I ilft expect the cumulative cutoff to rise by around marks this year, raising the expected cumulative cut off to Traditionally, the RC passages in the IIFT paper are in the format of case studies, presenting data and requiring analysis.
I wish all of you all the best for your final results. These questions had a lot of data, making them time consuming. General Awareness, 28 questions, 0. This section presented a lot of surprises for the candidates.
The paper also veered away from its traditionally difficult Data Interpretation and Reading Comprehension sections. The rest of the questions were from probability, mensuration, ratio and proportion and were extremely easy.
Written in the first person, the second passage was narrative and contained incidents from a writers life in school. A candidate with a good command over vocabulary would have been able to crack around 15 questions in 10 minutes.
Candidates should have been able to make at least possible attempts with a minimum score of around for this section. Gautam Puri is the co-founder of Career Launcher, a leading edu corp in the country. papet
IIFT 2012 analysis: Sectional cut-offs in the paper, overall difficulty level low
The passage had four questions, all direct. I would say this becaus ethere were less calculation intensive questions this year. I would predict that a candidate needs to score a minimum of marks in the section.
The data interpretation section is traditionally regarded as the most difficult part quesgion the test.
The other questions covered a variety of topics including coding-decoding, directions, number series and syllogisms. Looking at the question items would have helped the students attempt them with ease in less uqestion 5 minutes.
Rate this Article
Unlike the qustion two years, the test instructions clearly stated that sectional cut-offs would be levied this year. Overall, all candidates with quick reading ability should have been able to solve at least 2 passages. The first passage discussed the purpose of an organisation, defying its main aim pre-supposed as making profits.
These questions covered a variety of topics including politics, geography and history. Those with good english skills would have been ioft to crack the questions, since they were extremely direct and simple. Compared to last year, the one major difference was a less signifant presence of questions from the verbal reasoning section.
Based on a subject familiar to many, the topic of the passage ensured a quick reading and understanding of the same. Finally, the section had two questions which did not seem right. However, this year, the section was easier as compared to last year. The matching of the three parameter questions, which are considered to be quite difficult, were brought down from 3 last year to 1 this year.
Out of these, 1 question on the double pie chart set was wrong.