When Modernity eventually lost its way and had to abdicate in favour of its designated successor, the publicists for Postmodernism had a ready-made explanation at hand: Subscriber Login Email Address. The resurrection of the old-fashioned history of ideas, the unashamed celebration of the Enlightenment, the trenchant critique of religion, the dismissal of previously venerated figures such as Locke, Hume and Kant, the seeming obsession with Spinoza, the supposed lack of nuance in both philosophical understanding and historical account — all have drawn criticism from many historians and philosophers.
|Date Added:||15 August 2017|
|File Size:||18.19 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Israel's overall analysis of the Enlightenment has become the focus for a lively and very productive debate amongst historians, but while his overall interpretation has undoubtedly changed honathan historical perceptions of the origins of democracy and equality in western society, the details of his argument have not escaped critical scrutiny from a number of historians specialising in this field.
His engagements with the central texts of the 17th century--Locke's in particular--are breezy, unsystematic, and even careless. Peccato non sia stato ancora interamente tradotto in ital Una lunga, spesso difficoltosa, lettura.
All that aside, it is a pretty damn good piece of scholarship, and should be read by anyone who cares about modern intellectual history. Yet it could have been easier for reader to follow if the writer was more systematic in his approach. Does an 'intellectual history of the French Revolution' work, when built on the foundations of a political grand narrative?
Noel Malcolm Radicsl, Refresh and jonatuan again.
Libraries and Enlightenment 7: Israel, Martin Mulsow Hrsg. The history of print does not stop there, of course.
I share with Israel his enthusiasm for Spinoza. He nowhere explains my argument that subversive intellectual traditions evincing a capacity to harden into enduring ideological legacies that exert a major impact on society, originate in basic structural conflicts in politics and society.
It was a time of social and intellectual turmoil in Europe.
Granted, we will probably never have reliable figures on the actual circulation; but detailed reading of the papers themselves can give significant insights into the rapidly shifting impact of ideas and ideals during each of the critical turning-points of the revolution.
This theory is so fanatically formulated, again and again, that in the end I turned a bit sceptical.
Seeing reason: Jonathan Israel's radical vision | New Humanist
Israel's earlier volumes were criticised for finding 'spinozism' in some unlikely places — and indeed of attributing to Spinoza certain notions for example demands for women's emancipation which can barely be detected from an objective reading of the original text.
May 31, Willem rated it it was amazing. Spinoza rejected Cartesian dualism and developed his philosophy equating God and Nature. After France revoked the Edict of Nantes, Huguenots fled to the four winds, and a concentrated population settled in the Dutch Republic.
Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750
Though the scope of Israel's scholarship is impressive, one wonders whether depth was sacrificed at the altar of breadth in this work. End Matter Bibliography Index. Believers cavil at his insistence that traditional believers could not be political radicals. Books, journals, newspapers, handbills, sermons, proclamations, letters, manuscript, private diaries, and all other kinds of 'text', were not just means of communicating ideas: Where Do We Come From?
That may be one element in it. The end result of such battles - which have been waging ever since man first invented symbolic representation and language - has been a continuously shifting climate of opinion. radicla
The reader is left to think through the issues on the basis of his descriptions and from the words of the thinkers themselves. Cartesianism, the monadic philosophy of Leibniz and Wolff, and the deism and empiricism of Locke and Newton.
It is not surprising, therefore, to find another round of confrontations and tactical manoeuvres in the drafting of the second, much more democratic declaration of rights inwhere Condorcet again provided a version which did not secure consensus. Thomas Hobbes is the radival example. We may have to abandon attempts to understand the French Revolution by means of a single explanatory framework. Rousseau for the French revolution? The Enlightenment on Trial Bianca Premo.
Apr 22, Craig rated it it was ok. It provides the definite historical narrative of the influence of my favourite philosopher, and it does so convincingly, radial, and zealously.